![]() ![]() No, but seriously, if the user has to input a lot of different data fields, using a Wizard to split up the data entry into several related groups might help to make things less confusing. I'd agree with you that Wizards have their place. (Assistants are not mentioned in any other context, as in the other HIG:s, so I assume that means that Apple think they have no place except for setup) You don't have to use wizards-you can provide helpful information and assistance in any UI.įor products with complex setup procedures, a setup assistant can be helpful Wizards are a heavy UI, best used for multi-step, infrequently performed task. #DESIGN WIZARD PRO LIFETIME SUBSCRIPTION WINDOWS#Microsoft Windows Experience Interaction Guidelines:Ĭonsider lightweight alternatives first, such as dialog boxes, task panes, or single pages. ![]() Before using an assistant to step people through a complex operation, consider if the operation can be fundamentally simplified so an assistant is unnecessary. Often people will resort to re-running the assistant, re-entering many settings that they don't want to change.Īssistants are often used in situations where a better solution would be to simplify, or even better automate, the process. After using an assistant it is often hard to figure out where the individual settings aggregated into the assistant are stored. Assistants are useful for making complex operations less intimidating, as they restrict the information visible to the user at any given moment.Īssistants do have major downsides. Most are quite restrictive:Īn assistant is a secondary window that guides the user through an operation by breaking it into sequential steps. Here is what some common Human Interface Guidelines have to say about when to use them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |